Please reviewers should keep record of items approved after adjustments have been made to the previews concerning unlicensed images so that it won’t be disabled again by another reviewer. Thanks!
... Also for future references.
Rest assured, files will have notation for future reference.
Some of my item previews that were modified yesterday according to the instruction issued to all authors and re-submitted. They were approved and to my greatest surprise – disabled again. Please record of post-approved items should be kept so that it won’t be disabled again by another reviewer – knowing that all items without license (celebrities, etc.) have been removed from preview as instructed. Thanks support for your understanding!
Please I have an honest question. How can reviewers know which image is with/without license apart from the ‘celebrities and 3D games images’? There are a good number of free-to-use online stock image sites that supply us with good and dramatic images. To some people, it will look premium and copyright-protected but to others that are familiar with such images know that they are copyright-free. Celebrities and 3D games are what many consider as copyright-protected images which is correct because they are popular and hardly can any author afford to buy a world-class celebrity portrait for preview display but what about images you haven’t seen before? The reason why I’m asking is to encourage ‘careful review’ and ‘record input’ so that reviewers won’t suffer to go through the same review process again and we authors will know that our items are fit for sale on graphicriver. Thanks.