curtisschweitzer
curtisschweitzer Recent Posts Threads Started
67 posts
  • Sold between 5 000 and 10 000 dollars
  • Has been a member for 1-2 years
  • United States
  • Bought between 10 and 49 items
  • Referred between 1 and 9 users
  • Exclusive Author
curtisschweitzer says

The ProTools one sounds (to me) like its been better compressed/normalized, as you get a lot more presence from the PT version—I can hear the reflections from the reverb more clearly.

1380 posts
  • Envato Staff
  • Repeatedly Helped protect Envato Marketplaces against copyright violations
  • Reviewer
  • Sold between 10 000 and 50 000 dollars
  • Exclusive Author
  • Most Wanted Bounty Winner
  • Has been a member for 1-2 years
+5 more
lucafrancini Reviewer says

I did some more tests, changing the panning law and even checking the steinberg power scheme box, but they still sound different.

While testing I realised that the staccato viola I was using was a Round Robin one, so I loaded a Violas Pizzicato (without round robin) and did another test: the difference is more evident to me:

Pizzicato in Cubase https://dl.dropboxusercontent.com/u/62567774/cubase%20pizzicato.wav
Pizzicato in Pro Tools https://dl.dropboxusercontent.com/u/62567774/pro%20tools%20pizzicato.wav

273 posts
  • Elite Author
  • Sold between 250 000 and 1 000 000 dollars
  • Exclusive Author
  • Has been a member for 5-6 years
  • Bought between 50 and 99 items
  • Referred between 50 and 99 users
  • Author had a File in an Envato Bundle
+1 more
soundroll says

I did some more tests, changing the panning law and even checking the steinberg power scheme box, but they still sound different.

While testing I realised that the staccato viola I was using was a Round Robin one, so I loaded a Violas Pizzicato (without round robin) and did another test: the difference is more evident to me:

Pizzicato in Cubase https://dl.dropboxusercontent.com/u/62567774/cubase%20pizzicato.wav
Pizzicato in Pro Tools https://dl.dropboxusercontent.com/u/62567774/pro%20tools%20pizzicato.wav
It sounds now very different. Interesting…
836 posts
  • Author had a File in an Envato Bundle
  • Sold between 1 000 and 5 000 dollars
  • Has been a member for 2-3 years
  • Referred between 10 and 49 users
  • Bought between 50 and 99 items
  • Canada
gbiasillo says

From what I’ve seen, it’s not uncommon to use “some DAW” for composition and Pro Tools for mixing and mastering for this very reason: it simply sounds better.

1990 posts
  • Beta Tester
  • Envato Staff
  • Reviewer
  • Attended a Community Meetup
  • Switzerland
  • Author had a File in an Envato Bundle
  • Referred between 1 and 9 users
  • Repeatedly Helped protect Envato Marketplaces against copyright violations
+4 more
matsteiner Reviewer says

From what I’ve seen, it’s not uncommon to use “some DAW” for composition and Pro Tools for mixing and mastering for this very reason: it simply sounds better.
Are you kiddin’? I heard from many professionals that they changed to Cubase because it sounds better. It seems to sound better with summing. So there has to be another reason. Maybe the plug in is just programmed different?
1380 posts
  • Envato Staff
  • Repeatedly Helped protect Envato Marketplaces against copyright violations
  • Reviewer
  • Sold between 10 000 and 50 000 dollars
  • Exclusive Author
  • Most Wanted Bounty Winner
  • Has been a member for 1-2 years
+5 more
lucafrancini Reviewer says

To me this is not a matter of audio tracks mixing (I read about comparisons between daws with summing same audio tracks and there were no differences), but of plugin “reading” (vst, rtas). Tonight I’ll try other kontakt libraries and Omnisphere too (which has both samples and synthesized sounds) to see if it’s just the play engine or not :)

364 posts
  • Exclusive Author
  • Bought between 10 and 49 items
  • Referred between 1 and 9 users
  • Has been a member for 3-4 years
  • Most Wanted Bounty Winner
  • Sold between 1 000 and 5 000 dollars
musicguy says

First two samples – PT has more reverb, CB is more dry. The pizzicatos sounds like different samples, isnt round robin involved? Try to reset or turn it off before recording.

Plus PT version of pizzicatos have small error/click on first note at start of the sample note and CB doesnt. Reverb sound very different on both testing samples, strange.

549 posts
  • Referred between 100 and 199 users
  • Bought between 1 and 9 items
  • Sold between 10 000 and 50 000 dollars
  • Spain
  • Has been a member for 5-6 years
tacoMusic says

Are you kiddin’? I heard from many professionals that they changed to Cubase because it sounds better. It seems to sound better with summing. So there has to be another reason. Maybe the plug in is just programmed different?

I know you’re a hardcore Cubase fan Mat, but I’m yet to find one person who says Cubase sounds better than Pro Tools when it comes to mixing and mastering. Every pro mixer I’ve worked with when going into studios like Angel Studios and Air Edel in London has mixed with Pro Tools and always says it helps them get the best sound available.

33 posts
  • Exclusive Author
  • Has been a member for 3-4 years
  • Sold between 10 000 and 50 000 dollars
  • United States
Lmz says

Neither DAW sounds ‘better’. DAW’s are just tools and it’s how they are used that make the difference. I do think DAWs sound slightly different though. I bounce back and forth between Logic (sequencing) and Pro Tools (mixing) all the time. There’s the argument that they should be the same ‘sound’ because it’s digital but my ears aren’t convinced of that, at least in terms of realtime playback.

In the first examples you gave, check your pan law in cubase. Don’t match the number in PT though. Use your ears to find a setting that closely resembles the other. They probably won’t match. When I’m in Logic, I set the pan law to ‘0’ and for me that sounds a bit more like what I’d expect in PT (pan law in PT is at it’s standard of -3db).

In the second example, something is off because there shouldn’t be that much of a difference. Check out whatever audio settings/drivers you are using because there is a stark difference in frequency content. Also being EWQLSO, make sure you’re loading up the same mic position. Cubase example sounds like the stage mic and the PT sounds more like the close mic (possibly with the stage mic).

1380 posts
  • Envato Staff
  • Repeatedly Helped protect Envato Marketplaces against copyright violations
  • Reviewer
  • Sold between 10 000 and 50 000 dollars
  • Exclusive Author
  • Most Wanted Bounty Winner
  • Has been a member for 1-2 years
+5 more
lucafrancini Reviewer says

I have silver orchestra so I have only stage mic (unfortunately) and there is no round robin involved in pizzicato patch.

I’ve just tried with two patch of Omnisphere: one only synth and one only sampled sound and there are no difference at all between Pro Tools and Cubase.

The only explanation that comes into my mind is that East West programmed its RTAS version in a slightly different way than VST (I’m not a programmer I don’t know how, why, where :D).

by
by
by
by
by
by