Correct me if I am wrong… but shouldn’t all the votes have equal weight? I mean if someone truly finds a file to be poor, then they should be able to make that statement known with their vote, upfront.
I downloaded a Flash file and it was not as described and the developer basically said “tough luck, I am not helping” so I gave him a poor rating on that file, because I do not want another 4 people to waste their money and time like I did on something I was misled on.
Anyways, I do not think 5 people should have to download and pay for a junk file before the warning goes out to the customers… especially if they cannot get a refund.
I think if anything the rater should have to explain why they rated it as such. No comment, no vote.
Posted about 1 month ago







