AudioJungle

3d render rejected

6 posts
  • Author had a Free File of the Month
  • Microlancer Beta Tester
  • Sold between 10 000 and 50 000 dollars
  • Referred between 100 and 199 users
  • Has been a member for 1-2 years
  • Most Wanted Bounty Winner
  • Exclusive Author
  • Europe
themedia says

sorry, this should be in item discussion, but there is no option to delete a post, but anyway my 3d render was rejected

Here is the file: 3d smileys in a glass cup, 2400×1800px, JPEG and transparent PNG included

http://meediaveeb.com/preview.jpg

Reason: 1) Your file has some well done design concepts, however it does not meet the current and very stringent quality guidelines and we can not accept your file at this time.

any suggestions?

1307 posts
  • Indonesia
  • Has been a member for 1-2 years
  • Exclusive Author
  • Grew a moustache for the Envato Movember competition
  • Bought between 1 and 9 items
  • Sold between 1 000 and 5 000 dollars
canimalition says

Moved To Item Discussion :)

1610 posts
  • Bought between 100 and 499 items
  • Contributed a Tutorial to a Tuts+ Site
  • Exclusive Author
  • Has been a member for 2-3 years
  • Referred between 10 and 49 users
  • Sold between 5 000 and 10 000 dollars
  • United States
xstortionist says

The faces on the balls need to be improved. They look a bit horsey at the moment.

1235 posts
  • Community Moderator
  • Won a Competition
  • Author had a File in an Envato Bundle
  • Author had a Free File of the Month
  • Grew a moustache for the Envato Movember competition
  • Bought between 100 and 499 items
  • Referred between 200 and 499 users
+5 more
HarveyDesign moderator says
canimalition said
Moved To Item Discussion :)

Moved to Item Discussion. :D

791 posts
  • Bought between 100 and 499 items
  • Exclusive Author
  • Germany
  • Has been a member for 1-2 years
  • Interviewed on the Envato Notes blog
  • Microlancer Beta Tester
  • Sold between 5 000 and 10 000 dollars
chrisatlemon says

Honestly, I would ask for the reviewer to give some details as to what’s missing here. Personally I think it looks nice. Maybe they just question the usefulness. Maybe it’s not flexible enough. Maybe the reviewer spotted some quality issue I don’t see. “X” mentions the faces needing some work … I think that until you get some feedback from the review team it’s all just guesswork…

Cheers

Chris

by
by
by
by
by