My entry: Epic Choir Trailer http://audiojungle.net/item/epic-choir-trailer/9088657
Many interesting and insipiring cues here, guys! I haven’t listent to them all (and I probably will never do that ) but what I heard is outstanding!
Just one other point I wanted to make. Audiojungle being the main leader in the stock music industry now, I think it’s okay to push the envelope a little bit. Just because some other smaller stock sites may offer a broadcast license at a lower rate, doesn’t mean we should follow suit. The fact is, the quality at Audiojungle is a lot higher than most of these other stock sites, and is now the leader in the stock music industry. But as we all know, not just these smaller market buyers are picking up tracks here anymore. Just within the past couple of years we’ve seen a large influx of these big market buyers, and it will only increase all the more in the future. This is a great thing! But I think Envato needs to be the leader in the industry by making the leap of appropriately accommodating BOTH the stock and big broadcast markets, and fairly doing so for both buyers and authors alike. To me this definitely requires a higher 4th tier license.CUT
I agree with that. Lower rates could be ok for emerging stock sites, not for the leader of the market offering such high quality music like Audiojungle does.
To be more clear, I would need a central slider like here: http://www.profmedns.com/index.html?theme=NOSAA-HTML and clicking on the pictures the music player plays a music track. Do you have something to suggest?
Sound-Tricks asks:Thank you! This is definitely an improvement in the right way. In addition it should be easier to choose the right license. Which license should be considered for free to play videogames on the net (facebook, Kongregate.com, Newgrounds, and many others…): Broadcast or copies of downloaded products?
For online games that are streamed (and not downloaded), the Music Standard License allows unlimited streaming of these products.
My customers are mainly free to play online videogames developers. From my point of view, prices are good. I only think STANDARD LICENSE needs to be more restrictive and SHOULDN’T include online games. The mistake is to compare streamed online games to youtube videos. Online games are part of a market where developers earn money from a sponsor for every game released. They are commercial products, played milions of times, and in my opinion the appropriate license should be a step higher oof standard license. An half-way category beetween STANDARD and MUSIC MASS REPRODUCTION could be considered. Something like LOW VOLUME mass reproduction or something similar.
Nobody has an item with such features? It’s quite weird that nobody replied here!
Thank you! This is definitely an improvement in the right way. In addition it should be easier to choose the right license. Which license should be considered for free to play videogames on the net (facebook, Kongregate.com, Newgrounds, and many others…): Broadcast or copies of downloaded products?
That’s great! We will be on board!
Check also this track: http://audiojungle.net/item/caribbean-party/8357381
All the best,