Why did you change the image sizes to 1280×1024 while it doesn’t even show this original size on the page? It’s just bad, cuz when you click the source image, it’s HUGE and people can steal the logo examples and this makes a reason to add an ugly watermark to the images. Please make the image sizes the exact sizes that they are shown on the page.
Good question! We’ve changed the minimum size to allow for future design tweaks (so we don’t have to go back and get provider’s to update their images again in case we make changes), also it’s a sweet spot for the resolution most people view the site on according to analytics, it’s also in the same ballpark as many other portfolio sites and marketplaces – finally, we think it’s a great way for you to really showcase your work.
Also, not sure how people could steal the logos (it’s not like people would be happy using someone else’s business name?). But interesting point!
It’s definitely a lot bigger – but we think it’s the right decision. That said, we’re taking on feedback and watching the data closely to see how people use them. The new minimum size is the same aspect ratio of what we use on the site, so the images will scale to fit!
Hey all! Glad to see some love for the design generally! We do too. Looking forward to see how they perform when we open them up to buyers. Sorry you’re not a fan Deep_Blue – and appreciate your feedback about things! To be clear, at the moment the new design is only open to providers and we are listening to feedback at this stage quite closely. Just to reply to some of the things which have been brought up:
1) We are advertising similar services right at the bottom of listings and in most cases this is very far down the page. If you’ve done a great job selling your service I really feel it’s unlikely many people will click through to something else unless your service doesn’t meet their needs. We’ve put it in there for the buyer’s benefit in those cases (don’t forget your service will be advertised on other provider’s services too, so holistically we think it will be good for all providers).
2) Doru, I’m concerned to hear you’re still having issues with uploads, could it be your wifi connection? Could you try on a wired connection and let us know if you’re having troubles? We get reports if upload issues happen regularly and the devs haven’t had anything come up recently.
3) Devs are investigating reports of a portion of the 6th star appearing.
4) Why do you guys not like the large image size? Just curious on the reasons. I think they can make a strong impression if you use them well.
Thanks for the feedback guys!
Interesting feature, but I had a quick skim through the Envato Studio terms, and I’m slightly confused over one thing, from what I understood, whenever you complete a job, you get paid instantly over paypal/skrill? Can’t the earnings be added to our Envato accounts to then be paid via bank transfer together with Themeforest earnings? And after the job is done, will the “sale of service” appear in our statement here, similar to a theme sale? Or is Envato Studio account completely separate from Envato accounts?
Heya. Let me clarify. When you finish a job on Studio and the buyer has approved the work there is a 7 day period before the job is recognized as 100% completed. After 7 days, the money from the job will be credited to your account. The next month if your earnings are over $50 you will be automatically be paid out on the 7th to your nominated account. We use an entirely different finance system to Market, so your payout (and everything else) is entirely separate (but who knows what will happen in the future!)
We have an earnings page for providers which is similar to the statement, but it won’t appear in your Market statement.
I have a small question… i have just filled out the form for becoming a service provider. I only want to make WordPress theme installations for my clients/themes. I got a message stating that my application will be reviewed. Does this mean that theme authors can not be 100% approved on Envato studio ?best regards, Stefan
Hey Stefan! Unfortunately if you only want to offer installations/customisations for your own items that’s not something we support at this stage. If you are approved by our team and are an Express Service provider then you would need to do any install job that is assigned to you (including other author’s items).
Yes, all applicants will be reviewed by out team. Since Studio is a different service we want to make sure they’re the right fit for the site, though a good track-record on Market helps!
This is still just a first cut of integration with Studio. There’s a lot more we’d like to do .
Sounds good. And the “First Dibs” initiative is definitely a great startJordan_M said
As a bonus, join our affiliate program and earn 10% on new customers that purchase your Studio customisation service.
I’ve joined. No conversions yet but still happy to try and support the ecosystemJordan_M said
In the meantime, if you’re not crash hot on offering an Express Service for customization, you can always offer your own regular Studio service (with your own terms – price, turnaround etc) then link to it from your profile and item pages.
This is a great idea, and I never thought of doing it for one of my own items. Only thing is, I was kicked out of Envato Studio this week I had a service that was up for about a year. I thought it was a good service (no longer public, but screenshot here), but it only ever generated 1 job. I did get about 7-8 inquiries, but turned them down because the customers usually wanted additional features or functionality, which wasn’t really the service I was offering (I think maybe one time I turned someone down for not being available during a very busy time).
The email I got said “after review one or more services didn’t meet out new quality standards”, but I wasn’t exactly sure what that meant. I always knew the screenshots weren’t very flashy, so maybe that was it. And I also had an average response time of 16 hours, so maybe that was the unsuitable “quality” being referred to. Or maybe it was the fact that I just didn’t generate any money for the site, in which case I totally understand. But for the one job I did complete, the guy left a glowing review, and I was always very polite when replying to inquiries.Anyhow, it’s not really a big deal. I guess I just wish I would have been given the opportunity to improve the “quality” of the service before having my entire service provider status revoked. Or at least be given a better explanation as to why I was given the boot
Glad to hear you’re on board with the affiliate program. Where are you promoting at the moment?
Sorry to hear about your experience getting suspended. Since we launched, we’ve been doubling down on quality standards. I know a lot of services were looked at based on how engaged the provider was with Studio (aka – are you doing jobs, are you answering questions etc), are you selling yourself well (is your description well-written, are your preview images attractive) and stuff like that. The majority of services which were identified were judged to be ‘unsaveable’ or the providers engagement with the site not high enough to justify keeping them on-board. Which is why the call was made to suspend people. And I know review was letting some people back in if they replied and wanted to make improvements. In retrospect, the review guys have said it would have been good to provide more detail – so it’s good to hear your feedback (and I’ve passed it on to the team)!
In this case (because personally I know you’re a great freelancer!!), I’ve asked review to take another look at your Studio account and the suspension.
Sounds nice. But I got a question. What if we choose to provide theme installation service but the user’s server is impossible to do that? Like it’s an ASP server. Or hosting provider did not let the RAM usage more than 16MB but user wants WooCommerce? Or some core PHP extentions disabled by hosting to decrease CPU usage and hosting refuse to enable them? Or hosting does not give any kind of support? We saw these issues before. Is there an option to issue a refund in these situations?
Good question! If you get a job which is outside of the scope of the Express Service offer (or just is plain impossible), you should first of all explain to the buyer the reasons why it’s not possible or out of scope (we’ve been very clear about what’s included). From there you have two options, you can both agree to mutually cancel the job and the buyer will be refunded. Alternatively you can do the extra work (if it’s out of scope and possible) and charge extra for it by proposing a custom job (then you’re able to choose your own price and turnaround time on-top of what’s already been charged).
Hope that makes sense!
doru saidYeah I guess that’s true. And I definitely appreciate the effort Envato is making to allow authors to have “First Dibs” on their own work. I just wish authors were paid a royalty on the additional work. 5% seems like it would be fair (Envato could even charge a 30% fee for the royalty, making the actual royalty percentage 3.5%). Affiliates make much more than that, and directing traffic from our item sales is sort of the same thing.
don’t know. we sell items and the buyer can chose freely who they want to customize those items. the moment the item is sold the only thing we care is the license to be respected.
This is still just a first cut of integration with Studio. There’s a lot more we’d like to do .
In the meantime, if you’re not crash hot on offering an Express Service for customization, you can always offer your own regular Studio service (with your own terms – price, turnaround etc) then link to it from your profile and item pages. As a bonus, join our affiliate program and earn 10% on new customers that purchase your Studio customisation service. Quite a few Elite authors are doing this at the moment.