I agree! It happened to me too.
With the search system working the way it currently does with only EXACT title matches (and one-word synonyms) returning favorable results unless you have lots of sales you’re sending the track to the grave with a change like that.
It is seriously time for search improvement, but until that happens, please, if the title isn’t completely wrong for the track, let it be…
A random example: Search for “Three Day’s Ride” and you will find one song. Search for “Three Days Ride” – nothing. That is just… well, not very good.
It is very close. I’ll show some of them to the client.
Here are two more that I forgot:
Hi, maybe one of these? A few of them have versions without melody.
Hi, it sounds like a regular license would be enough.
It’s only if you intend to sell the end product, like an iPhone/Android game, that you would need an extended license.
My guess is that roughly 99.99% of the authors here do it themselves, but it would be interesting to find out if anyone lets someone else do it.
Very nice track, but you spelled “Dubstep” wrong.
If you have Gmail – list “All mail” or it will be hidden.
Well, it instantly makes you think of the original, that’s for sure, as the phrasing (and song form) is the same.
I don’t think you would get in trouble here though, since the melody is different. Personally though, I would probably change the phrasing of the melody to avoid being so obviously inspired by the original. And maybe change one of the sections to not reflect the original exactly in terms of structure.