Imagine just one second if maybe like 80% of authors on AJ would have the same homepage image complaining about this issue… It will not make a good image for the marketplace. I really don’t want to get to that extreme point but i think it’s the best way for us to be heard by staff.
Imagine if 80% disabled Extended Licences along with a message on their profile saying get in touch to negotiate the terms for an Extended Licence? My point being, disabling Extended Licences out of principal helps raise the issue rather than saying you disagree with the terms, while offering the licence anyway in my opinion.I expect you don’t like the idea of losing revenue from Extended Licences MP, me neither, but I don’t see how enabling Extended Licences while disagreeing with them helps this situation.
Well the situation is crap but since we “scoringaudiogeeks” are not top sellers, making aroundish 100 sales /month currently it won’t make a difference if we disable Extended licenses while all the top authors sell extended licenses. It just makes top sellers selling more since mediocre sellers have disabled some licensing options.
best way would be start selling videohive-projects and resell some top selling audio with ‘em or encourage videohive-authors to resell our music to emphasize more this matter
By the way, users cannot extract the audio to use in a separate project. They also can’t just add a bunch of music to something. It would need to be an integral part of the file.
Well what is the point to make collaboration with Audiojungle-author if you just buy extended license and get extra-”beef” to your Videohive-project? Basically Videohive-author can put all da moneyz in his pockets with this usage of extended license
It is very unbalanced and biased system: Videohive-author / Themeforest-author for example can include Audiojungle-track in his project but what options Audiojungle-author have regarding this?
So money-wise it’s better to focus on Videohive-projects and outsource audio buying extended licenses and reselling music with the project.
“It would need to be an integral part of the file.”
Well of course if somebody buys corporate presentation or logo reveal for example, he needs music for that project.
Well just enabled extended licenses – every top author have extended licenses enabled so it would be silly to have them unabled…
By “protest movement”, i mean like all having a profile homepage image with a message that says that we, authors, are not agree with this kind of licenses. And we’ll keep it until the situation doesn’t change.
So selling extended licenses same time and having some banner on homepage would make the difference? that sounds awkward
[x] extended licenses disabled
Just realised that you could buy extended license of logo reveal sound for like 25$ and include that to your Videohive-project
One of our songs was held 6 days i recall. No need to worry It had also positive extra feedback
EDIT . checked out timestamp + email so it was 6 days
You just edit desired track and upload new thumbnail for it.
I can load the nki files via Instrument Navigator or by dropping them onto Kontakt. I just can’t add the Intimate Strings permanently to the list of libraries on the left via the button Add Library.
It’s not powered by Kontakt-library so you can’t add those libraries into that tab… Use Quick Load-feature – you can make own folders and drag and drop nki’s there.
You can choose which track from your portfolio shows up on your profile page.
It’s more like first sale on July – http://audiojungle.net/item/caressing-the-harp/2750931 does this sale appear on July in your statement?